i p c v v ,
I promised no rules, but if I could
give you one rule that solved about 80 to 90% of all your
other comma dilemmas, a rule totally
consistent with the put-a-comma-where-you-pause-
when-you-read-it-aloud rule (see
Secret
of all Commas for that one),
but an enhancement of that
rule giving you about 190% assurance
of no comma mistake, would you live through the below
lesson so you have the background
for the rule to make sense?
The "rule" has to do mostly with
introductory adverbial clauses, but it also covers adjectival phrases
and in fact all
introductory phrases or clauses that can be followed by a comma. Occasions
like these
following sentences about one of
my favorite Butch-Cassidy-and-Sundance teams--Enkidu and
Gilgamesh, from the Babylonia Epic
of Gilgamesh (circa 2000 B.C.).
Although
Enkidu and Gilgamesh have just come from killing a huge monster ,
they are not having
an easy time of it with the Bull
of Heaven.
Grabbing onto
the bull's horns ,
Enkidu tries to lower the head so Gil can get a clear bull-fighter's
thrust down through the shoulder
blades.
While the heroes
battle with the bull ,
the goddess Ishtar is off rubbing her hands in glee, expecting
to be fully revenged for Gil's
insults.
To make this Bull of Heaven truly imposing , the artist has drawn it breaking the frame line.
Because we've
strained your attention span here (speaking of insults) ,
we will now give you
a graphic representation of the
battle with the Bull of Heaven.
Pretty cute,
eh? So stick with us; more to come after you do battle with the following
terminology:
phrase, clause,
introductory,
verbal,
verb
. (Also
finite and subordinate. Sorry!)
Here's the "rule," which is really two rules packed into one:
i p c v v ,
stands for:
Any
introductory phrase
with a verbal, or
clause with a verb,
in it, can always be followed
by a comma. You'll never be wrong if you put the comma in.
100% non-wrong.
Any introductory phrase or clause, with a verbal or a verb in it...slap
down the comma
and you can't go wrong. Enkidu
and Gilgamesh, who took on far worse challenges than that, never ever had
that kind of assurance. Check out what's been going on while we've been
working here:
All we need now, besides pick up the pieces, is to be sure about what a verbal is, right? Let's assume you know "verb"...all those words that express action: express, need, is, know, eat, fight, snort, aim, gore, beware, battle, kill, strain, have, thrust, zzooop, yoink, skreee, go, take, wait, mate, hate, crap, clap, slap....to name a few from the immediate environment, are all verbs. They're words that name an action, as opposed to a thing or an idea. So, to move on...
Well, wait. What's the difference again between a main verb and a subordinate verb?
Main verb = it can stand
all by itself, it's independent of any other verb. I say. say
is the main verb. Enkidu zzoooped through
the air, clutching the bull's horns.
zzoooped is main verb.
The bull yoinked Enkidu like beaten chaff, while his back hooves skreed
the ground.
yoinked is the main verb; skreed is a subordinate verb, made
subordinate by while.
Subordinate verb = it's not the main verb. I say that you should already know this. should know is a verb all right, but it won't stand by itself: That you should already know this. is not something you can whisper even to your significant other right off the top. It's subordinate to something main.
Ok for subordinate, ok for introductory...how about adverbial?
There are loads of introductory
adverbs, like because, when, while, whenever, since, as, however, as
soon as that force the verb they introduce, force it into a subordinate
(to the main verb) position:
Gilgamesh insulted Ishtar because he knew what she did to
all her lovers.
When Enkidu got hold of the bull's tail, he got a big surprise.
As soon as the bull was dead, Ishtar went bawling on the ramparts. Woe is Ish.
Since these subordinate clauses, introduced by adverbs (when, while,
as, ungh, etc.)
all tell you more about the main verb . . .
Gil insults Ishtar because...
Enkidu gets his surprise when...
Ishtar goes bawling as soon as...
Enkidu goes Ungh!! and the bull goes Graahgooahh!while
they went round.
...that is, they modify
the main verb, telling you the when or why or how about it, then they are
adverbial clauses, since adverbs, including adverbial clauses, modify verbs
(also adjectives and other adverbs, but let that go
for now). And as we've seen, these verbs introduced
by these adverbs are subordinate to the main verb.
As soon as the bull was dead, Sally! (You can't say that
and make full sense.)
As soon as the bull was dead, we chowed down.
(You can say that, particularly if you're a vulture.)
But here, the bull isn't dead just yet:
And the rule runs in part:
Any introductory clause with a
verb in it, can always be followed by a comma.
If the clause is short
and really really clear, then you
can skip the comma. But you'll never be wrong if you insert one.
Never. So forget that correllary for now and just bull your way in with a comma.
Most of these introductory subordinate clauses will be adverbial. There are also phrases that will occur up front, at the head of the sentence, and when they have a verb-like word in them, they can always be set off:
Realizing that a phrase is a group of related words, and noticing that this particular group of related words came at the head of the sentence, he felt quite confident about slapping down his big red comma.
To survive the last week of a semester, one had best have slept the month before.
Those underlined verb-like words
are called verbals. They're verbs, but they don't have any time attached
to them--they aren't finite, locked into a present or past or future.
He will always survive...that surviving is locked into the
future. She survived my tedious lecture... there she's doing
her surviving in the past. But, to survive is what it's all about,
or, To survive a nuclear war, you had best be on the moon... those
two survives don't have any time attached to them: they are infinite. (They
are infinitives, in fact.) That's all that's meant by finite versus
infinite verbs: time.
So, again, any introductory phrase
with a verbal in it, can always be followed by a comma.
And that's a lot like 'any introductory
clause
with a verb in it can always " " "
" ',
so why not stick the two together:
Any introductory phrase with a verbal, or clause with a verb, put down a comma.
Any
introductory
phrase
or clause with a verbal or a verb
in it,
can be followed by a comma.
i
p c
v v
followed by a ,
Enkidu could get vvwhipped around all day, while Gil seeks a vulnerable spot.
Because we don't have the finished art ready for the next
frame,
we have to go to the storyboard,
which may not scan so well.
^
And to do that right,
I
need Mandi anyway.
^
Notice, there's an introductory adverbial clause, and
then an introductory verbal phrase, and both are followed by commas and
both are exactly right. Would you write either of them without the comma?
Because
we don't have the finished art ready for the next frame we have to go to
the storyboard.
To do that right we need Mandy.
I still put the pause in, at the end of the introductory
stuff; so I would definitely put the comma in. But, following my ipcvv
rule , I
don't really have to think about it.
As for Enkidu, he gets into some pretty deep doo doo near
the end of the battle. Hard to believe it was written 3500 years ago...it
looks so comic-booky, but doo doo was always funny, I guess--to some.
(Like father like son!)
[Kevin art: Enkidu at the
tail of the bull, etc.]
To return to the homepage menu , click on :
